I'm sure reviews of this model has been done many times before, but here is my review based on the 2556 I own..
I am 57years old and have owned a boat (or boats) all my life since i was 9yrs old... all kinds of boats from dinghys, to 35ft motor yachts.... power boats and sailboats... new and used... boats have always been my passion, and I've learned a little about them over the years and feel I am qualified to give a fair review of the boat, overall..
The Bayliner 2556 was a great boat in its day, and by the current standard of this size of boats available today, the old 2556 is holding its own and is STILL a more desirable model than 70% of the new boats.
I am not sure why there is not a manufacture still producing a reasonably affordable, well equipped fiberglass convertible cruiser like the Bayliner 2556 because the market doesn’t seem to have faded...
Aluminum boats seems to have taken over the small cruiser market, but they don’t have the comfort or the character of a decently built fiberglass boat. I don’t believe they ever will... and still be affordable!
Over the years the Bayliner Ciera 2556 has been called a trophy, a convertible, and a command bridge. These names seem to be descriptive of the intended market at the time, but the boat itself was so well conceived that it had few physical changes to it thru the years of its production run.
The early trophy designation would indicate sales were pointed at the fishing market, where as the convertible designation alludes to it being a double-duty family cruiser/fishing boat, and the command bridge is pointing more towards the cruising market.... the early models were trophy's, only one year of 2556 had the “convertible” moniker, and all later ones were called a command bridge.
there is not a single determining feature that separated a hull with one name from another with the different name..
when sold new, the 2556 was equipped fairly well for a boat of its size and I believe this was due to bayliner trying to produce a boat that was turn-key in an attempt to make it a more desirable boat with a seemingly better value.
However well their plan worked for them at the time, I cant say... but these many years later after production ended, with all the competition that has came and went, the 2556 is still ranks as a very comfortable and desirable model.
the 2556 as it was originally built, was outfitted well for its time and market, and with a beam of 9'6”, it allows for a full sized interior cabin, and still have reasonable side-decks for when going forward to tend to the anchor... it was equipped with the amenities and space to allow the occupants to spend several days (or weeks) afloat cruising in reasonable comfort, yet still be easily trailered to locations where most cruisers with this much comfort would be difficult to take.
this 2556 I purchased was not even close to great condition, I am now the 3rd owner of it, and the second owner had it for 6 years but no clue as to how to take care of a boat (or even how to use a boat for that matter).... but all the pieces were there and except for the engine and added equipment, it is bone stock without any questionable modifications and holes drilled everywhere as is so often found in well used boats.
I can only assume that the original owner/buyer of it had more money than time or knowledge of boats, due to its condition (poor) and the way its outfitted (top dollar stuff and lots of it).
it has all been upgraded with expensive and redundant systems and the engine has been replaced in 2012 with a custom built engine from Motor Works in Spokane Washington
the interior is in nice condition, and with the exception of the hack job the second owner did to the galley contertop when he replaced the stove, it was clean and original... some of the settee cushions are getting threadbare from use, but no rips, or holes and it still looks good...
and of course I repaired and resurfaced the countertop due to all the screw holes, and oversized cutout it had for the stove...
The cabin of these boat has enough wood to make the boat feel warm and “friendly”, and enough fiberglass to make it solid and long lasting with a minimum of care.
It has storage enough for a couple who use the boat as a weekender, but if one has a desire for longer cruises it can be a bit of a challenge to keep everything organized... but there is a lot of room available that has not been opened up/developed, and when utilized it will nearly double the usable storage space, while making the living space a lot more user friendly and less cluttered.
….someone with common sense and tool savvy can easily reclaim this “lost” storage space.
depending on the size of the kids, the boat can sleep up to a family of 7-8 in the berths, but with grown children or adults, 2 in the v-Berth, 2 in the dinette berth and 1-2 in the quarter berth is more reasonable... but if one wants to sleep on the salon floor, in the cockpit, or up on the floor of the flybridge, it can sleep many more bodies.
But I must refer to my formula for spending time on ANY boat with more than 2 people... after 2 days, the number of people on the boat, times the number of days spent on the boat, equals a diminishing return on investment.... meaning it starts to become less fun each day one is cooped up on a boat with others, as even a roomy boat can quickly feel like a crowded boat.
the cockpit has room for 3-4 people standing at the rail fishing.. OR.. 4 deck chairs, and still be able to move about, but 2 deck chairs is more reasonable, but in some cases deck chairs may not be an option... and one still needs room for ice chests and bait buckets..
it has reasonable access to the engine and basic components (if one considers standing on their head “reasonable”), but one has to question the built in "fish box" that is in the cockpit floor just forward of the engine cover, because its difficult to access when fishing... it DOES have a discharge pump, but no ingress pump or insulation, so any fish you have in there is going to cook from the heat of the engine bay warming the box.. AND as delivered, if you wash the deck down or it rains hard, water will get into it, so its not even a good storage area either...
but I installed a double bulb seal on the bottom side of the lid/hatch cover so it doesn’t get water in it, and now it stays dry for storage of items that is NOT moisture sensitive....... because, even though water can not be sprayed/splashed into it with the cover on it like it used to, IF water does get in when the cover is off, it WILL NOT evaporate from the space, so mildew or corrosion could develop.
one could remedy this by cutting ventilation holes in the sides so that it could vent to the under-deck/engine compartment. or a single drain hole to the bilge would help.. or maybe the best idea is to remove the box completely and just use plastic storage bins in the vacant space..
when we were looking at buying a trailerable cruiser, I originally did not like the shape of the foredeck on the 2556's, but after owning it and using it, I realize it is a thought out design. it allows for head room below, yet giving ample room to work the anchor from the foredeck... and the rode locker is big enough to hold as much chain or rode as you will ever need on a boat of this size.
the anchor locker is not deep enough to allow the use of a conventional windlass, but a boat this size doesn’t normally carry an anchor so big that it needs a windlass... but for those that need help weighing the anchor, the locker can be made deeper so that a windlass can be used....or, my preference, use a windlass with a capstan or warping drum to help with the pull....
the side decks (cabin walk-around to foredeck) are reasonably sized with hand rails that are solidly mounted, but I feel they should have been mounted higher for better security when moving fore and aft.
the cabin is dry in the rain, but can be prone to leak at the rub rail as the boat ages... maintenance every few years may be required to keep it dry, but this is normal with a boat with this type of deck-to-hull fastening.
When equipped with the sbc 350/5.7 engine, it has been criticized by some as being under powered, and rightfully so if it was intended to be sold as a ski boat.... but it wasn’t.
As a cruiser/fisher, the 2556 with the 350 engine is reasonable and very adequate for its purpose. But I think anyone will agree that when equipped with the 454/7.4 it becomes a bit more fun.
I am not aware that any 2556 models were sold on the north American continent with the diesel engine, but it was an option on those sold in some other areas of the world.
It seems all 2556's, even without any gear on board, has a list slightly to one side or the other... it has been proven by some owners, that some of the boats were counter-ballasted with concrete... so one remedy is to remove the concrete and add batteries as needed... some owners just add more batteries to the light side. that adds more weight to the stern, but the boat can set level this way.
Due to the stern weight, I feel the OEM 12x12 trim tabs should have been twice that size, 12x24. this would help it get on plane quicker, stay on plane at a lower speed and keep the stern higher with less tab down.. less tab down = less drag... but when underway, the OEM 12x12 tabs do help compensate for the heavy stern and any list the boat may have.
A peeve of mine here about the OEM installed tabs..... they have wings on them that is supposed to help keep the water trapped under the tab longer, creating more pressure for better lift. the PROBLEM is, the tab mounting surface of the transom is NOT square to the flow/ direction of water flow as the boat moves thru the water, so while the tabs are mounted, the wings are planed inward about 1.25" over the 12” length of them and they create excessive drag.. 4 wings with that much drag can amount to 3-4mph at top speed, and raises the speed at which the boat would be capable of staying on plane at low cruise speed.
This problem is easily seen when looking under the boat and seeing how the trim tab wings line up with the under body strakes.... they don’t.
The problem can be remedied by bending the wings out nearly flat with the rest of the tab surface... with the leading edges of the wings very slightly bent upwards so it has a tendency to force the water under the wing even when crossing wakes and turbulent water.
I did this to mine and it eliminated most of the spray at the back of the boat during high speed operation.. this modification made such a difference that I upgraded to the 12x24 tabs without wings, which took a bit more creativity to install due to the curvature of the transom (long thin fairing plates were needed) and the difference is proof that the winged tabs were the wrong choice for bayliner to install on these boats. GREAT brand of tabs, just the wrong model.
So after installing the larger 12x24 tabs on my boat, I found there is a nice increase in lift and noticeable difference at top speed.. the lift is really noticeable at lower speeds as it allows the boat stay on plane at a lot lower speed... my boat, with all the gear that I carry, it is considered to be heavily loaded, (7750lbs), and yet will easily remain on plane at least down to 7mph (as of this writing, I haven’t ran it at a lower speed long enough to see exactly at what speed it wants to fall off)..
the PLUS side to the heavy stern is it allows the boat to ride well on the water. It handles wakes from other boats nicely at any angle, and by adjusting the trim of the outdrive with the trim tabs retracted, it also rides well in a choppy seaway
all the components, switches, electronics, appliances, etc, that came OEM installed seem to last for a long time with most still in service on most of these 20-25year old boats, so it shows bayliner tried for as much quality as possible at the price point they were offered at...
all boats have their downsides and even though it seems the 2556 was fairly well thought out and has few inherent problems, if I could redesign a few things on it, it would be to lighten the stern somehow, add a hardtop over the cockpit... and for maintenance purposes, it would have a LARGE full width/length removable cockpit floor, (with the normal engine access and fish box in it), so that when a tank, pump, wiring or other installed item needed attention, the entire floor could be removed to get at stuff.... ironically, all these design changes would ADD weight to the stern...
overall, my opinion of the 2226 is its a well built, solid, decently outfitted and comfortable boat that has potential for being modified and upgraded into a better and more comfortable cruiser, for the individual, than how it was delivered.
But of course everyone has a different opinion as to what features are necessary for them to be comfortable, and what size or type of boat they need to have to feel happy with it, but for 2 people who like to trailer their cruiser boat long distances so that they can enjoy boating experiences in different locations, and still carry all their gear, have the storage room, and the weather protection necessary to make every multiple day adventure a success, one will have to look extremely hard and be prepared to spend a lot more money in finding something that compares to the 2556.
personally, I have never had a desire to own a trailerable boat with a flybridge, because so many of the older boats of this size had so little room or comfort up there, and the platform was so short the helm seats were nearly overhanging the cockpit...then with the extra bit of mechanical up keep required it has never really appealed to me..... And so I wasn’t looking for a flybridge model when I found this boat, but it did all the other features I wanted, so I bought it.... and as much as I still don’t see the need for a flybridge on a boat of this size, I find that I do enjoy the view and the breeze while navigating from there on warm sunny days..
Comment